Opened every topic on a scenario
Each topic begins with a real-life situation before it reaches the concept. It costs thirty seconds and it is the difference between a learner who knows why they are watching and one who is waiting for it to end.
Work / Online degree provider · Ten courses
The fastest way to lose a learner is to open on a definition.
The commission was learning video across ten degree courses spanning management, computing and the humanities — public administration at one end of the list and object-oriented programming at the other. The inputs were faculty PowerPoint decks. The standards were prescribed, and they differed by course.
At a glance
Each topic begins with a real-life situation before it reaches the concept. It costs thirty seconds and it is the difference between a learner who knows why they are watching and one who is waiting for it to end.
The decks were the source, not the output. Storyboards established the visual treatment, supporting footage and on-screen text that would carry each topic.
Ten courses, each with its own specification to satisfy — while the production standard underneath stayed the same across all of them.
Short video, imagery and on-screen text chosen to support comprehension of that specific concept, which is slower than sourcing generically and is the reason the output doesn't look stock.
A faculty PowerPoint is a prompt for a person who is about to speak. It is not a storyboard, and translating one into the other is the central instructional work.
Adhering to per-course guidelines while keeping the programme coherent meant treating the guidelines as constraints to satisfy rather than as the design.
A relevant opening scenario for public administration and one for object-oriented programming have nothing in common except that a generic one would have been obvious to the learner in both.
Consistency across ten very different subjects isn't a template. It is a standard, applied by people who understood each subject well enough to know where it should bend.
More on E-Learning Development →Tell us the shape of it and we will tell you how we would run it — including if we think someone else is the better fit.